Usually, when I do fireside chat conversations at events, I'm the interviewer. Yesterday, at the Vilna Shul
on Beacon Hill, I was the interviewee and Doug Levin, CEO of Black Duck Software, was flinging the questions.
One thing he focused on, given the subject matter of yesterday morning's column
("Why Facebook Went West") was the differences between the tech economies here and in Silicon Valley.
I know that there's a feeling that we should stop obsessing about this... every time I make an East-West comparison in print or on this blog, I get e-mails and comments. To which I say, if you're not #1, and you've got a competitive spirit, it's natural to think about what you can be doing better.
Two people who were in the audience yesterday, David Aronoff of IDG Ventures
and Chris Herot of Zingdom
, posted some thoughts about the issue. (Dan Bricklin also has a post and a podcast recording
of the event.)
As I see it, there are five things that aren't working:
1. Our big companies locally don't seem to spawn enough start-ups.
2. Boston doesn't yet have a truly vibrant blogosphere that can help bring attention to new products/companies
3. Investors here can have blinders on when it comes to consumer-focused technologies, or anything that seems wacky at first (let's start a Web site that provides free hosting for videos, and has no business model, and let's call it YouTube)
4. Graduating students (or drop-outs like Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg) sometimes don't feel like there's enough of a vibrant community here that will support their ideas/start-ups
5. We don't have any big consumer device or consumer Internet companies locally.
Problem #1 will get solved, in part, if we get rid of non-compete agreements in Massachusetts. Let's make it as easy as possible for a smart person with a great idea to leave EMC, Analog Devices, Akamai, or Nuance and start a new company.
Problem #2 is getting solved -- slowly. But I'd challenge more entrepreneurs, VCs, and big company executives to start blogging (even if it's just once a week) about what you're interested in, cool companies you've seen, or new products you're playing with. In the Valley, one thing that can give new companies momentum is bloggers talking about, experimenting with, and evaluating their new sites or products. I don't think Flickr or Twitter would've been successful were it not for blogger support.
Problem #3 is hard to solve. We do have some VC firms and angel investors making risky bets. If they blogged about their riskiest deals, their most out-there bets, I think that'd be a positive thing (and it'd help with Problem #2). So I'm giving VCs permission to crow about the edgiest stuff they're doing. This does not mean
explaining to us why your new enterprise software company is really a Web 2.0 company in disguise.
Problem #4 is getting solved; Chris
, in his post, lists a bunch of new events that have been started in the past year or two, most of which are extremely open to anyone who wants to come. But there's more we could do. So two challenges to you:
1. If your company benefits from having a vibrant innovation economy in our region, you ought to host (or co-host/sponsor/support) at least one event a year that is open to anybody, and will help foster connections and conversations about innovation. It might be a gathering about how the Internet is changing PR (which I suggested last week to my friends at Schwartz PR) or an unconference about video or a breakfast panel about reputation systems in e-commerce. But it needs to be open and free. Think about the BU student or recent MIT grad who is starting a company that you'd like to do business with at some point, and make it possible for them to attend. Publicize the event on sites like Mark's Guide or Upcoming.
2. Established entrepreneurs, investors, attorneys, PR folks need to make themselves accessible to younger, less-established entrepreneurs. This might mean giving talks at local universities...judging business plan competitions...attending conferences on campus. This next generation of entrepreneurs needs your help, and the benefit of your connections.
Problem #5 will get solved if we work on Problems #1-#4.
So let's start working, shall we?
Labels: Black Duck Software, Chris Herot, David Aronoff, Doug Levin, entrepreneurship, IDG Ventures, start-ups, venture capital, Vilna Shul, Zingdom